<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SQL Server Q&#38;A &#187; dll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/tag/dll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa</link>
	<description>SQL Server Questions and Answers, SQL QA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>FIX: An access violation may occur when you remove all elements from the procedure cache for a linked server over an interrupted remote access connection</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2011/12/14/fix-an-access-violation-may-occur-when-you-remove-all-elements-from-the-procedure-cache-for-a-linked-server-over-an-interrupted-remote-access-connection-2/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2011/12/14/fix-an-access-violation-may-occur-when-you-remove-all-elements-from-the-procedure-cache-for-a-linked-server-over-an-interrupted-remote-access-connection-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B Module]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E Module]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedure cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote access connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sqlservr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation exception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2011/12/14/fix-an-access-violation-may-occur-when-you-remove-all-elements-from-the-procedure-cache-for-a-linked-server-over-an-interrupted-remote-access-connection-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsYou may receive an access violation exception if all the following conditions are true:You connect to a linked SQL server by using remote access.You run the DBCC FREEPROCCACHE Transact-SQL statement on the linked server to remove all elements from the procedure cache.The remote access connection is interrupted when you remove all elements from the procedure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2011/12/14/fix-an-access-violation-may-occur-when-you-remove-all-elements-from-the-procedure-cache-for-a-linked-server-over-an-interrupted-remote-access-connection-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIX: Some Named Pipes features are not disabled after you disable the Named Pipes protocol</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/09/09/fix-some-named-pipes-features-are-not-disabled-after-you-disable-the-named-pipes-protocol/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/09/09/fix-some-named-pipes-features-are-not-disabled-after-you-disable-the-named-pipes-protocol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coordinated universal time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft knowledge base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time zone tab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/09/09/fix-some-named-pipes-features-are-not-disabled-after-you-disable-the-named-pipes-protocol/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsWhen you use Server Network Utility to		disable Named Pipes as a communication protocol, the following Named Pipes-based		features are not disabled: 		Backup &#8230; To Pipe &#8230;Restore &#8230; From Pipe &#8230;Console.exeThis problem may also occur if the DISABLENETWORKPROTOCOLS		parameter is used by SQL Server Desktop Engine(also known as MSDE 2000) Service Pack 3 (SP3).ResolutionService pack informationTo resolve this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/09/09/fix-some-named-pipes-features-are-not-disabled-after-you-disable-the-named-pipes-protocol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIX: Restoring a SQL Server 7.0 database backup in SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 3 (SP3) may cause an assertion error in the Xdes.cpp file</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/07/14/fix-restoring-a-sql-server-7-0-database-backup-in-sql-server-2000-service-pack-3-sp3-may-cause-an-assertion-error-in-the-xdes-cpp-file/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/07/14/fix-restoring-a-sql-server-7-0-database-backup-in-sql-server-2000-service-pack-3-sp3-may-cause-an-assertion-error-in-the-xdes-cpp-file/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server 2000 service pack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server error]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/07/14/fix-restoring-a-sql-server-7-0-database-backup-in-sql-server-2000-service-pack-3-sp3-may-cause-an-assertion-error-in-the-xdes-cpp-file/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsIn Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 3 (SP3), when you try to restore a database backup, the		restoration may fail, and a retail assertion with error 3624 may occur. You may		see an error message that is similar to the following in the SQL Server error log		files as a result of the assertion error: 
SQL Server		Assertion: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/07/14/fix-restoring-a-sql-server-7-0-database-backup-in-sql-server-2000-service-pack-3-sp3-may-cause-an-assertion-error-in-the-xdes-cpp-file/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIX: Indexed View May Cause a Handled Access Violation in CIndex::SetLevel1Names</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/06/21/fix-indexed-view-may-cause-a-handled-access-violation-in-cindexsetlevel1names/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/06/21/fix-indexed-view-may-cause-a-handled-access-violation-in-cindexsetlevel1names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft knowledge base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/06/21/fix-indexed-view-may-cause-a-handled-access-violation-in-cindexsetlevel1names/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsA query based on an indexed view may cause a handled access		violation exception in the CIndex::SetLevel1Names function and end the connection of the client that submitted		the query. Additionally, messages similar to the following are written to		the SQL Server error log:
2002-12-30 13:17:01.99 spid51		Using &#8216;dbghelp.dll&#8217; version &#8216;4.0.5&#8242; *Stack Dump being sent to C:\Program		Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL\log\SQL00001.dmp 2002-12-30 13:17:01.99		spid51 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/06/21/fix-indexed-view-may-cause-a-handled-access-violation-in-cindexsetlevel1names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIX: Error messages after SQL Server 2005 or SQL Server 2000 has been running for some time on Windows Server 2003 or on Windows 2000: &#8220;Failed to load FileName.dll&#8221; and &#8220;Attempts to load any type &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/06/01/fix-error-messages-after-sql-server-2005-or-sql-server-2000-has-been-running-for-some-time-on-windows-server-2003-or-on-windows-2000-failed-to-load-filename-dll-and-attempts-to-load-any-type/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/06/01/fix-error-messages-after-sql-server-2005-or-sql-server-2000-has-been-running-for-some-time-on-windows-server-2003-or-on-windows-2000-failed-to-load-filename-dll-and-attempts-to-load-any-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic link library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sqlserver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server 2000]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/06/01/fix-error-messages-after-sql-server-2005-or-sql-server-2000-has-been-running-for-some-time-on-windows-server-2003-or-on-windows-2000-failed-to-load-filename-dll-and-attempts-to-load-any-type/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsWhen you run Microsoft SQL Server 2005 or Microsoft SQL Server 2000 on a Windows Server 2003-based computer or on a Windows 2000-based computer, you may receive an error message that contains the following error messages:
Failed to load FileName.dll
Attempts to load any type of dll might fail within the SQL Server process with errors pointing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/06/01/fix-error-messages-after-sql-server-2005-or-sql-server-2000-has-been-running-for-some-time-on-windows-server-2003-or-on-windows-2000-failed-to-load-filename-dll-and-attempts-to-load-any-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIX: An access violation may occur when you remove all elements from the procedure cache for a linked server over an interrupted remote access connection</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/15/fix-an-access-violation-may-occur-when-you-remove-all-elements-from-the-procedure-cache-for-a-linked-server-over-an-interrupted-remote-access-connection/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/15/fix-an-access-violation-may-occur-when-you-remove-all-elements-from-the-procedure-cache-for-a-linked-server-over-an-interrupted-remote-access-connection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B Module]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E Module]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedure cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote access connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sqlservr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation exception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/15/fix-an-access-violation-may-occur-when-you-remove-all-elements-from-the-procedure-cache-for-a-linked-server-over-an-interrupted-remote-access-connection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsYou may receive an access violation exception if all the following conditions are true:You connect to a linked SQL server by using remote access.You run the DBCC FREEPROCCACHE Transact-SQL statement on the linked server to remove all elements from the procedure cache.The remote access connection is interrupted when you remove all elements from the procedure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/15/fix-an-access-violation-may-occur-when-you-remove-all-elements-from-the-procedure-cache-for-a-linked-server-over-an-interrupted-remote-access-connection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIX: An access violation exception may occur when you use PDH APIs to collect performance data for several instances of SQL Server at the same time</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/11/fix-an-access-violation-exception-may-occur-when-you-use-pdh-apis-to-collect-performance-data-for-several-instances-of-sql-server-at-the-same-time/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/11/fix-an-access-violation-exception-may-occur-when-you-use-pdh-apis-to-collect-performance-data-for-several-instances-of-sql-server-at-the-same-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft knowledge base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance data collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server 2000]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/11/fix-an-access-violation-exception-may-occur-when-you-use-pdh-apis-to-collect-performance-data-for-several-instances-of-sql-server-at-the-same-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsIf you use a program that uses Performance Data Helper (PDH)		APIs to collect the performance data of several instances of Microsoft SQL		Server 2000 at the same time, an access violation may occur. For example, this		problem occurs if you collect performance data from six or more instances of		SQL Server. The performance data collection for the instances [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/11/fix-an-access-violation-exception-may-occur-when-you-use-pdh-apis-to-collect-performance-data-for-several-instances-of-sql-server-at-the-same-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIX: An access violation exception may occur when you run a SELECT statement that contains complex JOIN operations in SQL Server 7.0</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/08/fix-an-access-violation-exception-may-occur-when-you-run-a-select-statement-that-contains-complex-join-operations-in-sql-server-7-0/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/08/fix-an-access-violation-exception-may-occur-when-you-run-a-select-statement-that-contains-complex-join-operations-in-sql-server-7-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[exception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sql server 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Module]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server error log]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sqlservr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/08/fix-an-access-violation-exception-may-occur-when-you-run-a-select-statement-that-contains-complex-join-operations-in-sql-server-7-0/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsWhen you run a SELECT Transact-SQL statement to fetch data from your Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 database, an access violation exception may occurif the query contains complex JOIN operations.Additionally, you may receive the following error message:
SqlDumpExceptionHandler: Process 9 generated fatal exception c0000005 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server is terminating this process.You may also notice a short stack [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/sqlqa/2010/04/08/fix-an-access-violation-exception-may-occur-when-you-run-a-select-statement-that-contains-complex-join-operations-in-sql-server-7-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

