<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>.NET Questions and Solutions &#187; System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/tag/system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa</link>
	<description>.NET Questions and Solutions, .Net QA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 07:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Blocking the SBP-2 driver to reduce 1394 DMA threats to BitLocker</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/12/26/blocking-the-sbp-2-driver-to-reduce-1394-dma-threats-to-bitlocker/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/12/26/blocking-the-sbp-2-driver-to-reduce-1394-dma-threats-to-bitlocker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 11:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitlocker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct memory access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrity checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system integrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/12/26/blocking-the-sbp-2-driver-to-reduce-1394-dma-threats-to-bitlocker/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Symptoms A BitLocker-protected computer may be vulnerable to Direct Memory Access (DMA) attacks when the computer is powered-on or in the Standby power state, including when the desktop is locked.BitLocker with TPM-only authentication allows for a computer to enter the power-on state without any Pre-boot authentication. Therefore, an attacker may be able to perform DMA [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/12/26/blocking-the-sbp-2-driver-to-reduce-1394-dma-threats-to-bitlocker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An event may be logged after you restart Windows Server 2008: &#8220;Event ID: 5 Message: The Virtual Storage Filter Driver is disabled through the registry. It is inactive for all disk drives&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/11/29/an-event-may-be-logged-after-you-restart-windows-server-2008-event-id-5-message-the-virtual-storage-filter-driver-is-disabled-through-the-registry-it-is-inactive-for-all-disk-drives/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/11/29/an-event-may-be-logged-after-you-restart-windows-server-2008-event-id-5-message-the-virtual-storage-filter-driver-is-disabled-through-the-registry-it-is-inactive-for-all-disk-drives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/11/29/an-event-may-be-logged-after-you-restart-windows-server-2008-event-id-5-message-the-virtual-storage-filter-driver-is-disabled-through-the-registry-it-is-inactive-for-all-disk-drives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsAfter you restart Windows Server 2008, the following event may be logged in the System log:
Log Name:SystemSource:storfltEvent ID:5Level:WarningTask Category:NoneMessage:The Virtual Storage Filter Driver is disabled through the registry. It is inactive for all disk drives.ResolutionThis event is logged when one of the following scenarios is true:The virtual storage filter driver cannot attach to the virtual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/11/29/an-event-may-be-logged-after-you-restart-windows-server-2008-event-id-5-message-the-virtual-storage-filter-driver-is-disabled-through-the-registry-it-is-inactive-for-all-disk-drives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A memory leak occurs in performance counters that are used to monitor Windows Server 2008-based computers</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/09/26/a-memory-leak-occurs-in-performance-counters-that-are-used-to-monitor-windows-server-2008-based-computers/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/09/26/a-memory-leak-occurs-in-performance-counters-that-are-used-to-monitor-windows-server-2008-based-computers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[based computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[center operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance counters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/09/26/a-memory-leak-occurs-in-performance-counters-that-are-used-to-monitor-windows-server-2008-based-computers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsWhen you use Microsoft System Center Operations Manager 2007		to monitor system performance on Windows Server 2008-based computers, a memory		leak occurs. Specifically, this memory leak occurs in the performance counters		that are used by System Center Operations Manager 2007.Note  Any applications that use performance counters in Windows Server		2008 may also experience this problem.ResolutionThis problem occursbecause of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/09/26/a-memory-leak-occurs-in-performance-counters-that-are-used-to-monitor-windows-server-2008-based-computers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A 0xC0AA0007 error is returned when an application uses IMAPI v2 to burn some data to a recordable disc on a computer that is running Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/08/16/a-0xc0aa0007-error-is-returned-when-an-application-uses-imapi-v2-to-burn-some-data-to-a-recordable-disc-on-a-computer-that-is-running-windows-vista-or-windows-server-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/08/16/a-0xc0aa0007-error-is-returned-when-an-application-uses-imapi-v2-to-burn-some-data-to-a-recordable-disc-on-a-computer-that-is-running-windows-vista-or-windows-server-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMAPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/08/16/a-0xc0aa0007-error-is-returned-when-an-application-uses-imapi-v2-to-burn-some-data-to-a-recordable-disc-on-a-computer-that-is-running-windows-vista-or-windows-server-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsAssume that an application uses Image Mastering API version		2.0 (IMAPI v2) to burn some data onto a recordable DVD or CD on a computer that		is running Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008. However, a 0xC0AA0007 error is		returned.This problem typically occurs with backup applications that		use IMAPI v2. For example, this problem occurs when you try to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/08/16/a-0xc0aa0007-error-is-returned-when-an-application-uses-imapi-v2-to-burn-some-data-to-a-recordable-disc-on-a-computer-that-is-running-windows-vista-or-windows-server-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop error 0&#215;0000007f EXCEPTION_DOUBLE_FAULT occurs in Windows 2000 Server</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/04/18/stop-error-0x0000007f-exception_double_fault-occurs-in-windows-2000-server/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/04/18/stop-error-0x0000007f-exception_double_fault-occurs-in-windows-2000-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[command requests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protocol stack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recursive loop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Srv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop 0x0000007f]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sys driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/04/18/stop-error-0x0000007f-exception_double_fault-occurs-in-windows-2000-server/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsMicrosoft Windows 2000 Server may stop unexpectedly, and you may receive an error message that is similar to the following: 
Stop: 0&#215;0000007f(00000008, 00000000, 00000000, 00000000)EXCEPTION_DOUBLE_FAULTResolutionThis problem may occur if the Srv.sys driver enters into a recursive loop when the driver tries to flush files. The recursive loop occurs because the driver does not have write [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/04/18/stop-error-0x0000007f-exception_double_fault-occurs-in-windows-2000-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRB: &#8220;System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException&#8221; Error Message When You Call the MethodInfo.Invoke Method</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/02/23/prb-system-reflection-targetinvocationexception-error-message-when-you-call-the-methodinfo-invoke-method/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/02/23/prb-system-reflection-targetinvocationexception-error-message-when-you-call-the-methodinfo-invoke-method/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common language runtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[getstring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target of an invocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unhandled exception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/02/23/prb-system-reflection-targetinvocationexception-error-message-when-you-call-the-methodinfo-invoke-method/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsWhen you call the MethodInfo.Invoke method, you may receive the following error		message:
An unhandled exception of type		&#8216;System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException&#8217; occurred in		mscorlib.dllAdditional information: Exception has been thrown by the		target of an invocation.You may also receive an additional error		message that is similar to the following error message:
Unhandled Exception:		System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the		target of an invocation. &#8212;&#62; System.IO.FileLoadException: &#8216;ClassLibrary1&#8242;		is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2011/02/23/prb-system-reflection-targetinvocationexception-error-message-when-you-call-the-methodinfo-invoke-method/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIX: The System.EnterpriseServices.TransactionProxyException exception cannot be caught from other application domains when it is triggered during a transaction completion</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2010/12/13/fix-the-system-enterpriseservices-transactionproxyexception-exception-cannot-be-caught-from-other-application-domains-when-it-is-triggered-during-a-transaction-completion/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2010/12/13/fix-the-system-enterpriseservices-transactionproxyexception-exception-cannot-be-caught-from-other-application-domains-when-it-is-triggered-during-a-transaction-completion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assembly system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EnterpriseServices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TransactionProxyException]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unhandled exception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2010/12/13/fix-the-system-enterpriseservices-transactionproxyexception-exception-cannot-be-caught-from-other-application-domains-when-it-is-triggered-during-a-transaction-completion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsWhen a System.EnterpriseServices.TransactionProxyException exception is triggered during a transaction completion, it cannot be caught from other application domains. Instead, you receive a System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException exception that resembles the following: 
Unhandled Exception: System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException: Type &#8216;System.EnterpriseServices.TransactionProxyException&#8217; in Assembly &#8216;System.EnterpriseServices, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a&#8217; is not marked as serializable.ResolutionThis problem occurs because the TransactionProxyException exception is not serialized, and then [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2010/12/13/fix-the-system-enterpriseservices-transactionproxyexception-exception-cannot-be-caught-from-other-application-domains-when-it-is-triggered-during-a-transaction-completion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIX: A Windows Forms application that uses ActiveX controls may crash, and a null reference exception occurs after you install the .NET Framework 2.0 Service Pack 1</title>
		<link>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2010/11/14/fix-a-windows-forms-application-that-uses-activex-controls-may-crash-and-a-null-reference-exception-occurs-after-you-install-the-net-framework-2-0-service-pack-1/</link>
		<comments>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2010/11/14/fix-a-windows-forms-application-that-uses-activex-controls-may-crash-and-a-null-reference-exception-occurs-after-you-install-the-net-framework-2-0-service-pack-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft activex controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft customer support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft support professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft web site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object reference not set to an instance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2010/11/14/fix-a-windows-forms-application-that-uses-activex-controls-may-crash-and-a-null-reference-exception-occurs-after-you-install-the-net-framework-2-0-service-pack-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SymptomsAfter you install the Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Service		Pack 1, a Windows Forms application		that uses Microsoft ActiveX controls may crash.		When this problem occurs, a null reference exception occurs. Additionally, the following		call stack is generated in the Windows Forms application:
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.at System.Windows.Forms.AxHost.OleInterfaces.AttemptStopEvents(Object trash)at System.Threading._ThreadPoolWaitCallback.WaitCallback_Context(Object state)at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jack-fx.com/dotnetqa/2010/11/14/fix-a-windows-forms-application-that-uses-activex-controls-may-crash-and-a-null-reference-exception-occurs-after-you-install-the-net-framework-2-0-service-pack-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

